One question has been floating around our office for a week. Is good grammar more important than a great story? Of course, the perfectionist will claim that you can have both, but in reality, this is not true.
Let's even avoid the fact that the Chicago style of grammar used by fiction writer contradicts the AP style of grammar used by journalists. Oh and of course, we have to forget the difference between literary and mass market fiction.
But, once these are eliminated, is it more important to have a well written novel, or one that draws a deep, emotional impact from a reader?
Is it okay to use poor grammar when writing internal monologue, if the momologue matches the character's emotions?
Is it okay to shorten sentences and use fragments, to speed up the reader and increase their stress levels, building suspense?
Is it okay to have poorly constructed paragraphs, if those same paragraphs cause the reader to catch their breath and feel a bit stunned?
Here is a big one.... Let's forget what Mark Twain did for American grammar... is it okay to consider flawwed grammar a writer's style or voice?
Is the purpose of fiction or creative writing, to impress the reader, or give them an emotional experience?
Subscribe to Inspired author by Email - Click Here
Learn How to Write a Novel, Work at Home, and Get Published
No comments:
Post a Comment